this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
516 points (99.6% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

4677 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
9Q6u7hroWkwW9@lemmy.ml
516
Predictions on the state of work in the year 2000 (feddit.de)
submitted 7 months ago by Oiconomia@feddit.de to c/damnthatsinteresting@lemmy.ml
69 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

On the whole.... how would you define that? The mean? The median? If it's mean, he may have a point because the richest people don't have to work for many thousands of years each. But the median person is likely under poverty level.

And better..... also what is the definition of that? More money? More free time? Less crime/risk of injury? Etc.

And then there's the case that it doesn't matter if it's "better" than it was however arbitrary time ago, it matters that it could be better for a massively greater percentage of people. But in the current state it is only insanely better for only a select few, and nearly the same for the vast majority of people.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 7 months ago

Thank you for this. You’ve definitely given me some points to touch on.

For what it’s worth, I agree we should do better.