this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
516 points (99.6% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

4677 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
9Q6u7hroWkwW9@lemmy.ml
516
Predictions on the state of work in the year 2000 (feddit.de)
submitted 7 months ago by Oiconomia@feddit.de to c/damnthatsinteresting@lemmy.ml
69 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 18 points 7 months ago (4 children)

This is so uniquely depressing. They were accurate on my annual wage in 2024 yet they assumed Iโ€™d be working less than 40 hours ๐Ÿ˜ญ

[โ€“] Bonehead@kbin.social 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I think you misread that, because $40,000 in 1966 is roughly $385,000 in today's dollars.

Edit: conversely, $40,000 in today's dollars would be $4,176.25 in 1966.

[โ€“] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 9 points 7 months ago

Pretty sure that's the joke

[โ€“] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago

That was the joke. I make $40k today.

[โ€“] Sabata11792@kbin.social 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I got that wage, but not accounting for inflation...

[โ€“] Oiconomia@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago

With the 1966 labour share of income you probably would be working way less (or making way more)

[โ€“] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Is it really accurate? They wrote this is '66 about the year '00, which is 34 years. It's been another 24 years since their prediction date.