Linus Tech Tips

3783 readers

1 users here now

~~⚠️ De-clickbait-ify the youtube titles or your post will be removed!~~

~~Floatplane titles are perfectly fine.~~

~~LTT/LMG community. Brought to you by ******... Actually, no, not this time. This time it's brought to you by Lemmy, the open communities and free and open source software!~~

~~If you post videos from Youtube/LTT, please please un-clickbait the titles. (You can use the title from https://nitter.net/LTTtranslator/ but it doesn't seem to have been updated in quite some while...)~~

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

7heo@lemmy.ml

564

GN spends the first segment of their GN News to responding to Linus's comments, and reveals that Linus mislead people on the Billet compensation. (youtu.be)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml to c/linustechtips@lemmy.ml

117 comments fedilink hide all child comments

According to Billet themselves, they heard nothing about compensation or payback until about 3 hours after the original GN video went live.. Which Billet hadnt even replied to before Linus made his post saying they've already made the deal on compensation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ryumast3r@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

GN also literally said "auction" not "sold" in his first video, so Linus's response was doubly stupid.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It doesn't even matter. An auction is selling too, same thing. If I put my stuff on eBay and someone buys it I don't say I "auctioned it off", I say "I sold it to some guy on eBay". It's just fixed price vs a bidding, in the end a price gets reached and a transaction occurs.

Linus can't seem to take the L and just digs the grave deeper. Unfortunately at this point LTT is too big to fail, but I hope it puts a dent in their numbers and makes them eat some humble pie. Maybe they can fix their internal issues then.

[–] Ryumast3r@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean I completely agree with you in that the semantic bullshit is bullshit, my point was that Linus wasn't even correct in his attempt at BS because GN didn't use the word "sold". GN used the same word that Linus is attempting to say is totally different.

[–] SugaredScoundrel@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Linus used the semantics that it sold for "charity" ie. "We didn't sell it for money for us! We sold it for someone else's benefit!"

[–] Nefyedardu@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Linus's brain simply cannot accept he did something wrong, so the cognitive dissonance forces him to make these great leaps of logic. He could have ended everything with a simple "I'm sorry, we'll correct this" but his ego would never allow it.

[–] AssholeDestroyer@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Least apologetic Canadian.

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

He admits he doesn’t watch videos but instead reads the comments. Commenters often oversimplify things like this.