There was a great article in the New Yorker (or one of those style mags) a month or so ago that just ripped the industry apart about the billions of dollars spent on products that were overhyped and never shipped. I know that we’re feeling the pain of contraction right now, but we were dumping buckets of money into ideas that were not vetted - it was like the late 90s.

So, like with autopilot for cars, I will believe it when I see it.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’d try to use money to calculate that. For farming, there’s probably tons of data. But for growing meat, there won’t be as good a model of what this thing’s inputs are. Like say it takes a dropperful of iodine at one point in the process. What’s the energy content of that iodine?

Money would be a good approximation of this: what’s the cost of producing that pork versus rearing a pig?

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

For us, it’s essential that our meat is available to and affordable for everyone. So it will, at the very least, be the same price range as traditional meat.

That's the claim

[–] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 3 points 8 months ago

Only meaningless on one scale. It seems like a huge improvement on the animal cruelty scale.