this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
661 points (99.4% liked)

Memes

45228 readers
1294 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] natebluehooves@pawb.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the US? Yep! We really need working public transit that isn’t seen as a poor person’s “punishment”.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Public transit only works in densely-packed cities. I do not want to live in a densely-packed city. In suburbs, where life is relatively pleasant, public transit is agonizingly slow compared to cars.

[–] pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It works pretty well here in Berlin. The trains go far to the suburbs and beyond, are fast and comfortable. You pay 49 euros a month and can travel anywhere in the country with the ticket. Most of them go even at night.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, why don't you compare? Open up Google Maps. Choose two points in the suburbs, and see how long it takes to travel between them by car versus by public transit.

I did the same, between my apartment complex and a nearby business, and the estimates are 12 minutes by car and 47 minutes by bus. Main problem: there's a transfer in the middle of this route where I'd have to wait 11 minutes for the next bus to arrive.

I tried again with a different business, and got a direct bus route with no transfers and exactly the same route I'd take in a car. This is the best-case scenario for public transit, but going by car is still significantly faster: 10 minutes by car, or 17 minutes by bus.

[–] pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io 2 points 1 year ago

Usually either one bus or one train. 10 minutes longer, sometimes 15. And so much cheaper and better for the environment.