this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
622 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59235 readers
3262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 176 points 7 months ago (3 children)

hyper-competitive marketplace

Ah yes, when I think of "hyper competitive" I think of the one and only one cable provider who services my neighborhood.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 77 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Comcast calls me all the time trying to sell me on their ~~Trojan horse~~ streaming box or their cell service. I’m polite to the caller cause I know it’s just a gig for them but I always calmly tell them I only have Comcast as I have no other choice and I’d rather peel off my finger nails than give them any other business. It speaks to how bad things are that I’m dying for Verizon of all companies to come “save” me. Hyper-competitive, fucking lol.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Verizon FIOS is like a unicorn. Service is stable, price hasn't moved, support is available, clear and friendly. Install and repair dates are quick.

one day the shoe will drop, been waiting for it for years, but in my little corridor they just keep kicking comcast's ass.

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The shoe dropped on most of Verizon's former territory. Basically anywhere they had DSL but didn't want to lay fiber they sold off instead of even trying.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, if you ended up with frontier or anyone else they sold to you're going to have a bad time.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I had them when I rented and I was also surprised by how few complaints I had

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I was so happy when I was able to tell Comcast/Xfinity to suck toads after moving to an area with Google Fiber. Google may be a shit company, but I gotta admit I really love symmetrical gigabit service for $70/month.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's a local company in my city that offers fiber to the home. I'm so happy not to be stuck with Comcast!

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Same! I've lived 3 different places in this city and this is the first one that had an independent fiber internet provider. It's hilarious getting Comcast/Xfinity mailers advertising internet offers that are higher priced and slower than what I have.

[–] TacoThrash3r@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

I only have Comcast as I have no other choice and I’d rather peel off my finger nails than give them any other business

Literally me and cox communication

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I would hope this would also apply to the live TV streaming services like Hulu+live tv, Fubo, YouTube TV, etc. I looked into some of them, and the added fees took the monthly bill from like $83 a month to over $100 a month, but you don’t know that unless you read the disclaimers since they advertised it at $83 a month.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Seems like it certainly needs to. I haven’t noticed any such added fees for the services I subscribe to. If true, that’s a good indication someone is seeking a competitive advantage by misleading potential customers, and good reason to act

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This isn’t the worst offender I’ve seen, but it’s still bullshit. They should never be able to advertise it at $84.99 when there are $30.99 in required fees

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

That would go immediately on my list of “never do business”

[–] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

And the thing about regulation like this is that it just resets the bar height for everyone. It's not like this doesn't apply to all competitors.

Unless we mean non-cable competition, i.e. streaming. Maybe that's not under the jurisdiction of FCC? If not, though, then I have to wonder why this has to be an FCC thing in the first place. This is about truth in advertising, in general.