Facepalm

2636 readers

3 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Anticorp@lemmy.world

Educators ‘outraged’ after attorneys argue 1st-grade teacher shot in school is ‘workplace injury’ (www.denverpost.com)

submitted 1 year ago by DevCat@lemmy.world to c/facepalm@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

NEWPORT NEWS — The Newport News Education Association President condemned the premise of the school division’s motion to dismiss Abigail Zwerner’s pending $40 million lawsuit.

The motion was filed last week by attorneys representing the School Board and argues that Zwerner, who was shot in her classroom at Richneck Elementary in January by a 6-year-old student, is only entitled to file a worker’s compensation claim because the injury she sustained from the shooting is a “workplace injury,” and that the shooting was a hazard of the job.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry... but what the fuck are people bitching about?

The parent of the child is facing 25 years. The child has a history of really fucked up shit - the parents are at fault. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66451768

To me this just reads that the school district is trying to get worker's comp insurance involved for them to pay for it. After all, what school district has $40,000,000 to give to workers who get shot? A district can't begin to imagine a 6 year old is going to bring a gun in anyway.

Don't get me wrong, it's fucking horrible that the teacher had this happen. It's fucking horrible that a parent teaches their child racist slurs (as this one used to refer to the teacher after shooting her), it's horrible that parents have guns within reach of children. There are SO MANY fucked up things here. I just don't understand how the school is the problem.

[–] kamenoko@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're a peach. If the child had a history of violent behavior, and the school board never acted on any of it, and the student was allowed to continue attending class despite all the "fucked up shit" he did. Then the school board is absolutely liable.

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a 6 year old. Even if a 6 year old is known for being violent or rough - do you expect there to be a firearm in their bag?

What circumstances does one expect a six year old to produce a firearm and shoot someone? As far as I can tell it has literally never happened before or since this single incident, period. Six year olds aren't really known to be the typical school shooter demographic, that's more of the angsty teen age.

I don't think it's reasonable for schools to conduct bag searches on kindergarteners or first graders. They shouldn't really expect to have metal detectors either.

[–] garlic@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

If the US doesn't want to have metal detectors and bag searches.... then how about some gun regulations, to fix the actual problem? It's far too easy for Americans to get guns