this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
406 points (95.7% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2387 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The US needs to stop funding genocide.

Use the word. It's important. It's what it is. This is a modern holocaust happening before our eyes, and we are complicit in it.

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How the fuck are 'we' complicit in it when our government only follows the average citizen's will in 10% of their policies?

You're just like the megacorps chiding us for not recycling our water bottle caps.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The American public isn’t trying to recall or remove politicians who support unrestricted arms sales to Israel. Both Biden and Trump are for unrestricted sales, it seems.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

I agree that the word is appropriate, but it's also problematic because it has legal definitions that are almost never met. Someone will inevitably argue with the use of the term, and the conversation will be completely derailed by a vocabulary debate

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 10 points 6 months ago

I just say genocidal actions.

Hard to disagree there

[–] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 months ago

Ignore them. You can't patent the term genocide

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

They can argue all they want. I really don't care.

The legal definitions of genocide are only difficult to meet because they were written by countries with their own histories of genocide. That's why it's so hard to prove.

That's not a standard we need to hold ourselves to.