How can you claim that a negative is obvious if, to express it, you need to acknowledge its positive axiomatically to have something to subject to negation? Doesn't the very act of positing such a claim make it less obvious than if it were simply left unsaid?

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Don't play innocent, it's you who's claiming to obviously not be a banana. I'm asking: Isn't that denial suspiciously specific?

[–] Limeey@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think you’re confused… the video author is Vlad, he didn’t mean Putin…

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

That goes without saying, pretty much all undercover bananas, and not only those, are fans of Vlad.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm not claiming anything, obviously not.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Exactly what one would expect a banana to say in this situation.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

🚫🍌