this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
1014 points (96.9% liked)

Memes

49427 readers
1278 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Brute force protection

@memes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cobra89@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not to be pedantic but wouldn't it be IsFirstLoginWithAttemptedPassword or am I missing something?

[–] chraebsli@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no, since it first checks if the password is correct. if it is, display error message. if it is corrent and the second time, accept the password (code not in screenshot) but if the password is wrong, it doesnt check if it is the first attempt.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How does that stop a brute force attack? As written, it only stops the single luckiest brute force attack that happens to get the password right on their first try.

[–] chraebsli@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

You can't really prevent a brute force attack. Even if you prevent it from one IP or so, you can still do "distributed" brute force attacks.

Also only allowing one password per 5 seconds or so per IP will not work if you have lots of users and they are at work and have the same IP.

[–] pythonoob@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

It wouldn't stop most brute force attacks, which are not performed on the live web service, but rather on a password hasb list that was stolen via some other means.

No, it's correct - say your password gets leaked across thousands of passwords. A hacker will try to crack all of them with a program that guesses them once, which as the image suggests defeats these types of programs

[–] tarmarbar@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

You're right, and nothing wrong with being pedantic when working with code :)

[–] anders@rytter.me 1 points 1 year ago