this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
1400 points (97.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

5587 readers
3361 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Worse for humans? which humans? Also define worse, do we measure that in quality of life? How do you define quality of life?

The only thing I will strongly agree with is the eventual collapse of capitalism as we know it because it's unsustainable, but who cares the people who care will be dead and the people who exist in it won't know any difference. I think we're going to endure major changes between the current "countries" over the next few centuries but humans will probably still be around.

And if you were referring to the actual planet getting worse because of climate change, no matter what happens the earth will be fine regardless. The earth deals in WAY longer timescales than us pussy short term humans. It's proven resilient and been through ice ages, major celestial events/collisions, supervolcanos and life always prevails over time even if humans perish in the short term. Humans are pretty shit to be fair, we're parasites.

So again, what do you mean by worse? It's subjective and dependent on timescales.