this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
237 points (100.0% liked)
196
16238 readers
1722 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Although I've read the book and have issues with some of the choices on screen, this film absolutely feels like a labor of love done with the highest possible technical level, I truly, truly liked it.
While watching the film, I was suddenly struck by the parallels between Stilgar and Morpheus from The Matrix. Neo is most definitely a Kwizats Haderach figure.
I really appreciate the mindfulness of the decisions made to adapt the film to the screen, nearly 60 years after the book was published.
Chani being a non-believer made her relationship with Paul more compelling, especially when they made her part of the prophecy she rejects (although admittedly the way that was executed was a little corny). The reduced time spent at Sietch Tabr kept the pacing of the movie feeling consistent without the need for large time skip between films. And the rejection of Paul as emperor by the Landsraad makes the inevitability of Paul's Jihad that much more apparent.
None of these are changes that would have improved the book (except arguably about Chani's doubt in the prophecy), but they definitely fit the film without really detracting from its central theme