this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
303 points (88.9% liked)

Fediverse

28480 readers
643 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Highlighting the recent report of users and admins being unable to delete images, and how Trust & Safety tooling is currently lacking.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 73 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This link has been posted and discussed on Reddit too.

Of course, we shouldn't care about what people on Reddit think (and I noticed this post by chance since I log on there very rarely now), but some users in the thread genuinely ask about joining Lemmy and so I guess it's useful to know about possible obstacles to trying it that they may perceive.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 50 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That OP has been crying everywhere about the Lemmy devs being mean to him. Saw a few threads of his here on Lemmy.

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 74 points 8 months ago (13 children)

Ya, reading the GitHub issue sounds entirely like burnt out devs being abused by users. It's a massive issue in open source.

The Late Night Linux and Linux Dev Time podcasts talked about exactly this in a recent episode. It can be extremely demoralizing to do all this work for free for a project only to be inundated by ungrateful people demanding you fix something or implement a feature they want. Many open source projects have died because of that.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

We're not talking about a user demanding you release a flatpak build targeting their personal linux distribution running in a VM'd WSL, we're talking about a consumer facing social app that doesn't include the functionality for a user to delete something they added.

You know what the acronym used for describing the most basic functional web app api is?

CRUD - Create, Read, Update, Delete

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

we're talking about a consumer facing social app

What we're talking about is a complete free and open source project that's built and maintained completely through volunteer labour.

There are zero obligations towards the people actively using the software.

While I agree that the functionality should exist, the devs can literally do whatever they want. Nobody is paying them.

Edit: you're also seeing only a single instance of a conversation. I can guarantee that the devs have been dealing with asinine and demanding users for a while now. There comes a point where your patience wears thin.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

There are zero obligations towards the people actively using the software.

Yes, there are, and that obligation is to not publish something as production ready if it is illegal to use because of how it's built.

I'm a software developer, I understand exactly how frustrating user demands are, that was still a completely and utterly unacceptable way to respond to a very politely worded request for software that literally just doesn't break privacy laws to run.

As the commenter pointed out, if you don't want to fix it, fine, but then you absolutely have a moral, ethical, and professional obligation to document that clearly in your README.md.

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Yes, there are, and that obligation is to not publish something as production ready if it is illegal to use because of how it's built.

No, there really isn't. Do I feel that project owners should follow good practices for maintaining clean code that also allows users to keep things legal? Absolutely I do.

But that is not the same thing as an obligation. If there was a single cent exchanged between the devs and anyone else (donations do not count) then this conversation would be entirely different.

I don't agree with the devs' stance. But it is 100% their prerogative to say no. It's their project, not ours.

I'm a software developer, I understand exactly how frustrating user demands are

As am I.

that was still a completely and utterly unacceptable way to respond to a very politely worded request

I agree.

As the commenter pointed out, if you don't want to fix it, fine, but then you absolutely have a moral, ethical, and professional obligation to document that clearly in your README.md.

No, you absolutely do not. Although I do somewhat agree on the professional part, but it's still not an obligation. It's completely unprofessional, but that's different than it being an obligation.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] pop@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago (17 children)

You seem to know what you are talking about. Have you made a pull request yet?

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] spiderman@ani.social 16 points 8 months ago (10 children)

while i think there are people like that i think this particular issue is a serious issue that should be handled properly. i think the conversation should have been much professional from both sides, but nonetheless this issue addresses a serious problem.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's how a Minecraft server I ran died. Too many people telling me how to run it and trying to break things when I was asleep.

[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Ya, I know exactly what you experienced. It sucks and it's why we can never have nice things.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

No space for muh centrism

lol