this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
890 points (100.0% liked)

196

16488 readers
1536 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
890
Lactose intolerant rule (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 8 months ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

Well in his case it wasn't just the dick itself. Women were "disgusting". So the dick needed to be attached to a manly man.

What exactly is gay? To me it's when a manly man likes manly men. If you'd fall in love with a woman and THEN see her male genitals, it wouldn't be gay. She just was an ass to not tell you earlier ๐Ÿ˜ If you'd see both genitals or none, it wouldn't be either. And yes, there always have been those with both or none.