Linguistics

488 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!

Everyone is welcome here: from laymen to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.

Rules:

Stay on-topic. Specially for more divisive subjects.
Post sources whenever reasonable to do so.
Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
Have fun!

Related communities:

founded 9 months ago

MODERATORS

lvxferre@mander.xyz

Esperanto: The artificial language that aimed to unite humanity (bigthink.com)

submitted 7 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/linguistics@mander.xyz

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Currently Esperanto is in a weird "double dilemma":

it's weakly designed, but languages with a better design barely have speakers;

it's spoken by a relatively low amount of people, but the other options are all languages associated with national identities.

Reminds me of the programmer's expression: "there are two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about, and the ones nobody uses"

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 7 months ago

Yup. It's a bit like this, but on two levels - people complaining about natlangs because "nobody"* uses Esperanto, and complaining about Esperanto because "nobody"* uses the other auxiliary conlangs.

*I mean, proportionally.