this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
1074 points (86.1% liked)

Political Memes

5455 readers
2499 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Please start your comments with the following question answered at the top:

"Will you vote for Biden in the 2024 election?" [Y/N]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Let me get this straight - you want the government to cut a check made out to Donald Trump for a “literal army” of lawyers? Because that’s how that would work. The criminal justice system cannot place an unreasonable financial burden on a defendant that is presumed innocent.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Lmamamamamamamamao

Hold on.

The criminal justice system cannot place an unreasonable financial burden on a defendant that is presumed innocent.

Yup still laughing. Just a minute.

Okay okay. If Martha mother of 2 can end up homeless, in and out of jail, and jobless, because her court appointed attorney got her a not guilty verdict then Trump can fucking pay for lawyers.

[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If Martha mother of 2 can end up homeless, in and out of jail, and jobless, because her court appointed attorney got her a not guilty verdict

Did you mean a guilty verdict? In either case, you have a point. The justice system is far from perfect, and what you’ve described is a perfect example of that: courts tend to respect financial burden more than they do conflicting obligations (e.g. a job). But should we be advocating for an objectively worse legal system because Trump is protected from being forced to choose between inadequate representation or shelling out tens of millions of dollars? I don’t think so.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.cafe 1 points 8 months ago

That guy has no idea what they’re talking about.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)