this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
1389 points (93.7% liked)

tumblr

3318 readers
78 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.

Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
1389
The problem with not voting (fedia.io)
submitted 7 months ago by perishthethought@lemm.ee to c/tumblr@lemmy.world
476 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Make n"none of the above" a valid candidate. If it gets more thanx%, remove everyone, hold a new election. Rince and repeat until you get a clear winner.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If that were gonna work, third party candidates would get way more than they do, since that's effectively what voting for them is.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The real solution is a multi-candidate system and then proportional representation. The radicals would never get in then because there isn't actually that many people who support them, but when there's only two options (or effectively only two options such as in the UK) you have to pick one or the other, or not vote. So normal people end up voting for insane mad man who shouldn't be in charge of a light switch, simply because there's no better option.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 0 points 7 months ago

No. Cause if they win they actually win and I'm really not sure I actually want Russian friend, or Kennedy but not really.

A "none of the above" option that sends it back to primary or at least a debate and then new election would be vastly different.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Very few people would use this making it the exact same as refusing to vote.