Technology

59021 readers

3079 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

678

Doctors Concerned About Neuralink's First Patient (futurism.com)

submitted 8 months ago by catculation@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world

118 comments fedilink hide all child comments

• Concerns rise as Neuralink fails to provide evidence of brain implant success, raising safety and transparency questions.

• Controversy surrounds Neuralink's lack of data on surgical capabilities and alarming treatment of monkeys with brain implants.

• While Neuralink touts achievements, experts question true innovation and highlight developments in other brain implant projects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

“full self-driving” has already killed a lot of people.

There's only one death linked to FSD beta and even he was driving drunk.

In a recent interview, Rossiter said he believes that von Ohain was using Full Self-Driving, which — if true — would make his death the first known fatality involving Tesla’s most advanced driver-assistance technology

Von Ohain and Rossiter had been drinking, and an autopsy found that von Ohain died with a blood alcohol level of 0.26 — more than three times the legal limit

Source

However there's approximately 40 accidents that have led to serious injury or death due to the use of the less advanced driver assist system "autopilot".

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 8 months ago

You’re right, I was conflating the two. However, I suspect there are more cases than just this one due to Tesla’s dishonesty and secrecy.

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

(Why would the human's inebriation level matter if the vehicle is moving autonomously?)

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because it's not autonomous, nor "full self driving". It's a glorified adaptive cruise control. I don't think it's even in the L3 category... (I'm not the biggest fan of the autonomy "levels" classification but it's an ok reference for this).

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Tesla would just get up and lie to the public like that?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago

Agreed. Also while it’s impossible to say in any individual case I suspect people might be more likely to drive while inebriated if they believe the autopilot will be driving for them.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

This kind of thinking is why these accidents happen. The goal of autonomous driving is for it to one day be better driver than the best human driver, but this technology is still in its infancy and requires an attentive driver behind the wheel. Even Teslas tell you this when you engage these systems.