this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
119 points (100.0% liked)

tails: A Place for Mastodon Posts

328 readers
1 users here now

A virtual community

Posts from Mastodon users, featured natively in a community, so you can view them without the need for them to be re-hosted or screenshoted, and reply to the original author and Mastodon respondents if you wish.

Has so far included content from Warsandpeas, Mr. Lovenstein, SMBC, Loading Artist, Low Quality Facts, nixCraft, ElleGray, and other interesting or provocative stuff I've random'd across on Mastodon.


Supported:
Comments & Upvotes
Unsupported:
Posts, Downvotes, & PD's Automod

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Image description: penis shaped prints in snow from a hopping animal


(Originally published on ohai.social: 2024-02-23)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] freamon@endlesstalk.org 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How the fuck was this unanswered for ten hours?

At the risk of doing the same thing: because it was never really a question.

[–] Turun@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Then the title must have been changed

Um… anyone know what kind of animal left these prints in the snow?

Seems pretty explicit to me. In addition to that, the other comments suggest that this is not common knowledge (a wallaby? Something hopping with a tail?), so I don’t think the title was intended to be a rhetorical question only.

[–] freamon@endlesstalk.org 6 points 10 months ago

The title here is the same as it as on Mastodon. The ALT text for the picture is displayed as ‘Image Description’ in the body of the Lemmy post. As that states, the prints being from a hopping animal has already been guessed. The OP is called ‘Meanwhile in Canada’, indicating that it’s an account for the non-serious side of Canadian life, and that it was always very unlikely going to be a wallaby (pretty much native to Australasia only).

The thing is: no-one really cares what the animal actually is - the photo has been posted because the prints look a bit like a penis. It’s a jokey question, for which the appropriate response is a jokey answer. Anyone trying to factually identify the animal is being way too literal, and somewhat missing the point.