this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
254 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

48090 readers
743 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Oh, it totally could.

I don't actually see anyone in here making such an argument.

[–] clearleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How is this notable or interesting then? I thought we were all just accepting that malicious software is an inherent part of all open platforms.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Open platforms often have individuals running/hosting their own repositories, which means the risk is distributed.

This means that the individual repository can be attacked without affecting the whole network. The risk is still there, but they would have to simultaneously attack all repositories at once and succeed with all of them.

In a corporate-hosted platform like Snaps, you have one centralized location that can be abused and that can affect all repositories in the system.

If someone hacks Canonical, they can make the whole Snap Store an attack vector without nearly as much effort.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago

If someone hacks Canonical, they can make the whole Snap Store an attack vector without nearly as much effort.

So basically the same as if someone hacked flathub? Or if someone hacked Canonical/Debian/Red Hat/whoever and gained access to their package signing key?