Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54539 readers

186 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com

dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com

751

Court blocks $1 billion copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users’ piracy (arstechnica.com)

submitted 8 months ago by Yglorba@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

99 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One thing that leaps out at me about this ruling is that courts understand the internet a lot better nowadays. A decade or so ago Sony would have probably gotten away with the argument that Cox profited from the users' piracy; nowadays judges themselves use the internet and are going to go "lolno, they probably would have been Cox customers anyway. It's not like anyone pays for internet connection solely to pirate. And in most areas people don't even have a choice of provider, so how is Cox profiting from this?"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Edit: looks like I need a new VPN...

I use private internet access (pia). It's reasonably priced, really good for the number of devices, and I don't believe they keep logs. At least it used to be that way, but I haven't checked that since I signed up a decade ago. I have had zero issues with anything or anyone while using it for any reason. Uptime is basically 100%. Also has mobile support if that matters.

[–] Confound4082@lemmy.ml 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They got bought by an Israeli adware company a few years back

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well fuck me...

[–] Confound4082@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

ProtonVPN...

[–] squid_slime@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Flashbacks of waterfox browser and system11 😕

[–] TheGoldenGod@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I know the feeling, I used PIA for a while but moved to Mullvad.

[–] Lemonparty@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Same, I used to use PIA for about a decade, but I could've sworn I heard they were one of the ones that had gone way downhill. Otherwise I never had an issue with them. I'll have to do some digging, see if it was founded or just a reddit rumor.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

PIA’s service is still decent and offers all the features that other VPNs do, but they got bought out by a company that has added spyware to programs in the past. So many users jumped ship when that buyout was finalized, because it’s hard to trust their application or their service when the owning company has a known history of intentionally infecting their users.

[–] Lemonparty@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

Okay yes that's what I remember reading. I have Express VPN now, and while researching found it's still surprisingly highly and doesn't log. it's on the more expensive side though, so I may still give proton or one of the other recs a try.