this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
65 points (91.1% liked)

World News

32227 readers
495 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] podperson@lemm.ee 36 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The article said it well - why do we consider a slight decline in population of any country right now a horrible thing? The planet needs it.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

We know why, because degrowth means less wealth in the pockets of the owners of news organizations

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Is it bad for me to be apathetic or is there something in it for the commoer?

Like I'm ready to shrug and say "personal problem bro" to the wealth reduction of the elite. Wondering what else needs to be considered.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Because almost every country and economy has been built on the assumption of exponential growth of a constantly renewing pool of young workers that will pay for the upkeep of the growing elderly population. For example, currently 18% of the Chinese population is over 60. It's going to be roughly 40% by 2050ish.

The planet will definitely be happy though. Humans, not so much.