this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
1108 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59457 readers
3546 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] poshKibosh@sh.itjust.works 146 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Even if there was some secure, hardened way of verifying people’s ages without handing over PII to random websites, these age verification laws are still utterly ridiculous.

It’s not the government’s job to parent your kids on the internet. If you don’t want your kids visiting specific websites or viewing specific content, you take 15 minutes out of your goddamn day to do your job as a parent, and set up a content blocker on your home network.

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you take 15 minutes out of your goddamn day to do your job as a parent, and set up a content blocker on your home network.

Or, I don't know, talk to your kid?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Oh absolutely but that's a parent's decision. They might decide to be a crap parent and do the minimum amount of effort possible but if they're going to do that then they should be the ones to install the blocker not the government.

I remember when they tried to introduce a similar law in the UK and absolutely nothing ended up happening because it's utterly unworkable.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can't you just use a VPN to get past a content block? Sounds exactly like a project a 14 year old me would research

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Teaching the youth to protect their Internet identity feels like a win.

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How'd you get your user name like that?

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You can update your display name on your instance website.

[–] ladananton450@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Perhaps, but most of the good ones are paid, and I would try to set up some way to monitor the internet traffic if I really wanted to go that far.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I self-host on a VPS, but also spoof the client hello of another website so it looks like I'm accessing yahoo.com or something

You would have to actually reverse lookup each IP to realize "hey, that's not a yahoo.com IP"

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

Nah, it's easier if I have the state do it for me while inconveniencing everyone else. /s

[–] Techmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like the average person has a clue how to configure a content blocker. LOL

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 12 points 1 year ago

Not sure why you're being downvoted, you're right. The average parent has no idea how to block their kids from visiting pornhub. I don't think that's an excuse to make age verification required. Parents should educate themselves on this stuff.