this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
531 points (97.2% liked)

Videos

14285 readers
105 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (3 children)

My hot take is that he’s also much better when given constrained time. The Problem was interesting, but his comedy and commentary is forced to be much more clear and concise on the Daily Show. And when something bombs, the Daily Show doesn’t leave time to wade through a segment that isn’t working.

[–] P1r4nha@feddit.de 7 points 9 months ago

Not a bad take. I agree he's funnier in the constrained time, but I also liked the The Problem where he had more time for thoughtful discussions, interviews and debates. A lot less funny though.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Might also just be different and better writers on The Daily Show. /shrug

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

I legitimately didn't enjoy the panel format most episodes.