Progressive Christian

134 readers

1 users here now

An inclusive community for people of faith, centred on the life of Jesus.

Share stories. Ask questions. Engage in conversation about the intersection of life and faith.

Rules

We have no official statement of faith. Different perspectives are welcome, and gatekeeping who should be considered a “true Christian” will not be tolerated.
No discrimination. All people are welcome here, regardless of religion, race, gender, sexuality, or age.
Take a charitable posture. Try to assume the best of your fellow contributors, and be curious rather than confrontational.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

annegreen@sh.itjust.works

Reading the Bible (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by annegreen@sh.itjust.works to c/progressivechristian@sh.itjust.works

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I’m interested to know how other people approach reading the Bible, and what it means to read the Bible well.

For me, reading the Bible well means reading in context, as revelation, for Christ, through the Holy Spirit, with the Church, from the margins, by faith.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ColoradoBoy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Bible for me is like a conversation with my 3,000 year old faith community. It is not:

Inerrant: it was written by flat earthers
The actual “word” of God: Jesus is the Word of God and the Bible shows how we’ve been wrestling with God over time
In all ways permanent: the Bible writers and Jesus change meanings, interpretations and more — all over the place. So can we. Language, culture and science advance and we cannot expect every single thought someone had back then to carry forward or make sense.

I like your hermeneutic above. Christ first. Definitely the Holy Spirit although a lot of Protestant types are afraid to listen in silence and trust what they hear. Definitely the church, we are the body of Christ and it important to help each other grow in our understanding. As the UCC says, “God is still speaking.” I especially like that you listen to the margins. Christianity is a faith of the margins, despite how Christian nationalists and prosperity gospel preachers try to pervert it.

I’m indebted to Martin Luther in many ways, but Sola Scriptura is a pair of handcuffs on many faith journeys.

[–] annegreen@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think “conversation” is the key word here. It’s a means of engaging in dialogue with our predecessors, who wrestled with many of the same questions we do today.

These days, I interpret the idea of “sola scriptura” to be more closely related to the doctrine of the priesthood of all believers than the infallibility of the Bible. I recognize that this may not be what Martin Luther had in mind, but I’m comfortable asserting that we don’t need to rely on the clergy to interpret scripture for us. I don’t think it’s wise to reject the wisdom of the church or to read the Bible outside of community.

[–] ColoradoBoy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Thanks. Helpful take on Sola Scriptura. Rohr talks about his tricycle of experience, scripture and tradition. I think the Methodists have a similar take and add a fourth pillar of reason. But scripture is just one element. I think tradition is an extension of scripture, the conversation continues.