this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
62 points (98.4% liked)

Programming

17416 readers
47 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It takes time to implement features. Execs and managers don't want to implement the wheel and developer time costs a lot more money than security vulns.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

On the other hand, reinventing the wheel isn't really great, either.

Part of the reason for bloat is the fact that frameworks and libraries became huge, a basic Spring Boot webserver is already gigantic.

[–] otl@hachyderm.io 7 points 9 months ago

@agressivelyPassive

> Part of the reason for bloat is the fact that frameworks and libraries became huge

Absolutely. What I find funny is that the inverse is kinda true, too. Tiny dependencies (as seen in the Javascript world) are also to blame. They’re so small, I’ve noticed some devs say “well it’s so small, what’s the harm of one more?”. Bloat by a thousand deps.

@programming

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

IMO, some things will require obligatory security checks. They will have to be legally binding too. Then businesses might be forced to care.

Without any consequences, nobody will care until something happens.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0