this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
1362 points (95.3% liked)

Memes

45646 readers
1273 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I would argue that the zodiac is the proto-science of psychology.

This is people trying to find behavioral patterns

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Faulty pattern recognition isn't something we should be holding on to.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It is the alchemy to the chemistry is what they are saying

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So not at all based in science? Interesting as a historical curiosity but nothing more?

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Interesting because of the psychological insights into not how all people are, but how people make up theories in general. Same way religion has scientific significance in an anthropological sense.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Perhaps "historical curiosity" was a little obtuse of me.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

And how many people are still using Alchemy?

[–] beardown@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

"I turned 5 pounds of lead into gold this morning using this one weird trick that chemists HATE! Subscribe to my premium substack to learn more!"

[–] explodicle@local106.com 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They told us the history of alchemy in chemistry class, it's good to know the context.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca -1 points 9 months ago

Yes, but no one credible still uses it. Which was the point I was making.

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that we still don't have a proper pattern recognition. We could discard all the soft sciences such as Economics, Sociology or Psychology.

[–] psud@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What hard sciences could replace economics and sociology? They're not very rigorous, but they seem to be useful. Psychology also takes some load off psychiatrists

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So is palm reading; for grifters.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fuck those people who wanna categorize me so they can ignore who I actually am and just put a handle on me.

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

No they don't. They want to put me in a neat little box for easy handling.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Then they should talk to me, rather than rely on generalizations that were created a couple of thousand years ago and revived by new age mystics.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I just did a quick search and the difference between seeing astrology talk about fate vs personality is at least 1200 years apart.

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Economic Science is also about fate

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Cough... science...cough