this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
321 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59438 readers
3041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

While I agree wholeheartedly, that is unrealistic due to laws. You can't reveal certain suspects identity because for certain crimes, like pedophilia, people will attempt to execute the suspect before they know whether or not they actually did it.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

I mean police footage would be privacy invading as hell for victims and even just bystanders.

[–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A charge being filed against someone is already public record in the majority of areas in the United States, as well as any court records resulting from those charges.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I forgot to add suspects that are minors, not positive but pretty sure they can't be shown either.

[–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Then they could just withhold the video from public since they're already withholding the charge. The real issue would be protecting victims, not suspects.