this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
420 points (88.9% liked)

memes

10279 readers
2354 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Many "alternative" search engines are better for privacy, but they are still vulnerable to censorship, because they rely on g**gle and m*crosoft's indices for their search results. This isn't a deep-hidden secret either, many of them disclose what search index they use on the "about" page, for example:

There are still search engines that (claim to) maintain their own index. Most surprisingly, br*ve:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mofongo@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How does it compare to DuckDuckGo?

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

With Kagi I get what I want and sort through way less to no junk. With their lenses I can push reliable sources up and other sources down. I really like it.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. I hope that they provide a way to exclude Brave from the search engines (not optimistic considering the libertarian tech bro tantrum the lead dev threw but...).

But I think the advantage is really the personalized results over anything else. Sometimes you get some REAL fucked up SEO-heavy results. So you just block that site. And then everything works.

It DOES make me more than a bit concerned over how much data they have on me (especially as you need to use an access token to use it in an incognito window... where you are searching for the sketchiest shit) but... google already has that so...

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

They claim that no information on searches is a saved to an individual for now.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Companies claim a lot of things. Let's see how the first legal issue plays out

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I will say part of the reason I find them more trustworthy is that their business model hinges on some sort of ounce of privacy. Google's hinges on exactly the opposite.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago

I strongly encourage reading up on the various VPNs and the like that charge people while still monitoring and tracking everything they do.

[–] mofongo@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Ok that sounds neat thx