Green - An environmentalist community

5315 readers

1 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!

RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith

Related communities:

Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

theloneforager@lemmy.ml

Chloe@lemmy.ml

New study suggests culling animals who 'don't belong' can be a flawed nature conservation practice (phys.org)

submitted 9 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/green@lemmy.ml

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

I have witnessed it plenty, I'm an ecologist. I was simply saying it could be argued. Also in case-by-case situations not as a blanket statement for everything.

But you also need to look at it from outside of our little human perspectives and from an evolutionary time scale.

In 90% of cases almost everything affected would suffer negatively in the short term, but 100000 years from now things would adapt and nothing we do would have made much of a difference.

Also humans are part of nature. If a species arrived on an island 500 years before we discovered it, and caused mass devastation to local fauna and flora that we didn't witness, we would simply classify it as native to the island because it was there when we found it. Had we gotten there 501 years earlier we would have classified it as invasive and probably our fault somehow. Whether something arrives in the hold of a ship or stuck in the talons of a bird it still gets there naturally, we can't just separate ourselves from nature because we think we're special.