this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
482 points (94.5% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5681 readers
435 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

... A dictionary? We already have those in English lol.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oxford University Press doesn't have governmental enforcement powers the way the OQLF does.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Users dictate a language more than anything else

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

No, French has private dictionaries that aren't normative. This isn't that.

The Académie is a quasi-governemental institution built by Louis XIV to impose a normative version of French. They initially reformed the language but quickly ended up enforcing the linguistic status quo. French hasn't had a (much needed) structural reform in about two centuries.

What the academy defines to be "proper French" is essentially the only French that is used by the government, media, and school system, and they refuse to acknowledge changes in usage at every turn.

This means that French is set in stone and mid-19th century books have essentially the same grammar as 21st century French apart from some very minor differences.

(I won't get into the systemic and very successful repression of minority languages which is closely related).