Privacy

31892 readers

588 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What is the community's opinion on Session and Session Automated Software? (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As most people here might know, Session utilises a TOR-like onion routing system with some changes to route traffic. The username is the public key whilst the password is the private key.

Recently, a new project built on top of this seems to be in the works: https://simplifiedprivacy.com/freespeech/

I'd like to know the community's opinion of session and how much would you trust its technology. Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Desyn0xox@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think it's an interesting project. However I am not a fan of their decision to omit forward secrecy, and have thus passed on using it. At least for now.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I didn't know they did that. Unless it's a technical limitation of Loki Net (which should be worked on if that's the case), this is borderline unacceptable for a product made for privacy. Thanks for pointing it out