this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
326 points (93.4% liked)

World News

39000 readers
2408 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] argh_another_username@lemmy.ca 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I don’t think you understood the article. She refuses the ones she can, but USPS simply dumps the packages at her door. There’s no refusing. And she’s being charged $300 for unwanted packages. And she already started donating them. I the end, she’s paying to get rid of somebody else’s stuff.

This is fucked up.

Edit: People, I have no idea why she’s being charged for those packages, I don’t know how USPS works. This is just what’s in the article.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How can she be charged for parcels she did not actually accept? Or is the law quite different over there? As in, how would she be charged, there's no signature of her to agree to pay, say, customs. As she never signed for the parcel.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

The law says you are right. UPS ignores this and sends the invoice anyway with some added bullying to pay the outstanding amount. As long as somebody pays and they don't get a letter from a lawyer or they get sued for littering nothing happens.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She likely can't be compelled to pay for the packages. If they are COD it's up to the shipper to get the Cash on Delivery and they are failing in that. Still a big annoyance I'm sure.

[–] ZombieTheZombieCat@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She probably has her credit card info on Amazon and the seller got it and has been automatically charging her. It's harder and takes longer to get charges reversed than to just not respond to a bill in the mail

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The article didn't mention that her card has been getting charged, that would be much worse.

She believes that Amazon sellers stole her information from a dormant Amazon account and are using her name and home address as an easy way to get rid of unwanted return items that sellers either cannot afford to store or do not wish to store. The Better Business Bureau (BBB) told CBC that it sounded like a vendor-return scheme that's common in the US but rarer in Canada, where foreign sellers dodge fees associated with storing and shipping return items by sending the items anywhere but their own addresses.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh I see they're abandoning the packages. So what's she had to pay then? I guess I don't understand was she sent to collections? The whole point of CoD is the carrier has package as collateral so...?

Even still if ups refused to resolve the issue I'd let them sue me and get it thrown out in time.

[–] Anomander@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

UPS is being UPS here.

They're abandoning packages, then sending her a bill for COD as if she accepted the package but didn't pay.

The fact that if she digs in and fights it she can eventually dispute each charge is somewhat separate from UPS and their collections contractors harassing her about the 'debt', or the new packages that keep showing up.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Better to have a lawyer send them a letter she will sue for littering and fraud otherwise nothing happens

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Involving a lawyer will instantly cost her more than all the delivery charges combined.