this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
1955 points (98.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
985 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 145 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    All chat programs are shit for long term accumulation of knowledge. Discord, revolt, IRC, they're all just as bad for it.

    Forums are where you'll find people who are actual experts discussing because they want to be able to easily reference previous posts by other people.

    [–] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

    IRC at least you have text logs, but I agree.

    [–] erev@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    we just need IRCv2 which should add chat history

    [–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

    How do you replicate a conversation like this in a IRC format?

    https://www.advrider.com/f/threads/yamaha-wr250r-threadfest.936588/

    [–] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    Where's lemmy in regards to this?

    [–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

    Lemmy/Reddit style platforms are good at generating short term discussions, it's threaded chats.

    The main features that makes forums the best to accumulate knowledge is bumping and linear discussions. There's only one discussion that everyone is following if they want to talk about a specific subject, the knowledge on that subject is centralized and keeps accumulating instead of requiring to be constantly repeated because the previous thread is lost to time. The linear discussion means you don't have to go back up and start reading a different branch to know what some other people are talking about (which often times leads to having many people basically saying the same thing without realizing it), all new replies appear in chronological order and people quote others to provide context when necessary.

    Look on old school forums for more "boomer hobbies" and it's ridiculous how long conversations can keep going. I provided a link in another reply but the Yamaha WR250 thread on ADVRider has 428k replies since 2013, all that is possible to know about this motorcycle is in they thread and pretty much any question you might have will have its reply in there. There's car forums with discussions that have been ongoing for decadeS!

    Meanwhile on Reddit of you want to ask a question in a thread that was started 24h ago you're shit out of luck, no one but the OP will know about it. On Lemmy? Everyone sorts by top 6 hours.

    [–] SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    In regards to the advrider comment, I don't find those ridiculously long-running threads all that convenient even though they are very useful. In your example the WR250R thread could have multiple subtopics being discussed at once in the same thread which I find frustrating.

    For example, one guy might ask about tires and while that's being discussed another guy shows up asking about a big bore kit to make more power. Now there are two discussions happening at the same time and all I can do is view the thread chronologically. Then someone else shows up asking what oil everyone uses. Then someone new joins and says "Hey it's not possible to go back and read through all 2300 pages in this thread, what GPS are you all using?"

    Like sure it's great that all the information is in that one thread but navigating through it only in chronological order can be super frustrating.

    [–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    ADVRider is more of a "motorcycles in general" community and they try to limit the number of "subcommunities" (the Wr250 thread is in the Thumpers subcommunity), but a WR250 specific forum would have the discussions you're talking about split up.

    The real solution though would be for a "Reddit style forum" to exist, where people can create new subcommunities however they want but to have it work like a forum instead of having threaded discussions that don't get bumped.

    [–] SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

    It actually drives me a little nuts that the 500 EXC-F thread is under Thumpers and not under Orange Crush. I get that it's a Thumper, but it's also a KTM. Why have a subcommunity based on engine type when all of the other engine types are in manufacturer-specific subcommunities?

    [–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

    I honestly don't know why they decided to divide it this way and as you say it would make much more sense to split it by manufacturers and that's it, maybe it started with Thumpers and Others and as more and more manufacturers started making ADV motorcycles with other types of engines the "others" section became too crowded? 🤔