this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
1836 points (89.9% liked)

Political Memes

5605 readers
1484 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's almost like it's a setup designed to disenfranchise voters or something

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Nah, allowing Trump, a fascist who will enable even more genocides, to have a second term through inaction doesn't make sense and should be discouraged. It's like the people who are saying they won't vote for Biden are trying to suppress voter turn out. It seems to be accelerationists who think they will somehow benefit from the chaos and death caused by a fascist takeover. edit: typo

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh I'm right there with you. I mean, I do think the system has been engineered to maximize voter disenfranchisement still, but regardless I also think it's one's moral imperative to participate and vote anyways. It's the bare minimum, and harm reduction is better than nothing.

One thing I think a lot of people in this thread don't realize is that, the more people are mobilized to vote, especially for a 'lesser evil' candidate that they may not be excited for, the more velocity we have to propel a more desired candidate into office.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

One thing I think a lot of people in this thread don’t realize is that, the more people are mobilized to vote, especially for a ‘lesser evil’ candidate that they may not be excited for, the more velocity we have to propel a more desired candidate into office.

This summarizes it nicely. High voter turnout in 2024 can only help us in 2028 with a better, more progressive candidate.