this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
263 points (90.7% liked)

Open Source

31133 readers
274 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
kevincox@lemmy.ml
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml
263
Enshittification of GitHub? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 9 months ago by antrosapien@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
119 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

First, they restricted code search without logging in so I'm using sourcegraph But now, I cant even view discussions or wiki without logging in.

It was a nice run

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I'm not a developer so I'm not very familiar with this world. But it kind of amazes me that the code for so many open source projects are hosted by Microsoft. Isn't there a FOSS alternative? edit: seems Gitlab is an alternative. Then the question is, why are people using microsoft products?

[–] OddFed@feddit.de 24 points 9 months ago

Codeberg.org is the ethical choice

[–] antrosapien@lemmy.ml 20 points 9 months ago

Github started independently and was amazing service(and still is except now its going downhill) but Microsoft acquired it it 2018

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The power of git ( the backbone of github ) comes in that you can easily take a repository and move it to a different server. Its like, 3 commands? ( git vlone, git add remote, git push ). So if people would leave github, nothing is lost :)

[–] federico3@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Github is designed to centralize git (as the word "hub" suggests). You can still migrate away code, issues and wikis, but contributors, followers, wiki editors, issue subscribers, visibility in general and github stars are locked in. Discoverability matters to projects trying to attract contributors.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Agreed there, but its still a source control platform. Its still git. I'd argue the code is the most important part and followers, subscribers and stars (whatever those may do) are a secundairy functionality that a developer doesnt necesarily care about. The most important part is the git repo and everything linked with it imo

[–] Belzebubulubu@mujico.org 1 points 9 months ago

So you lose nothing, gotcha