Linguistics

503 readers

5 users here now

Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!

Everyone is welcome here: from laymen to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.

Rules:

Stay on-topic. Specially for more divisive subjects.
Post sources whenever reasonable to do so.
Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
Have fun!

Related communities:

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

lvxferre@mander.xyz

[Sci.News] Post-Neolithic Diet-Induced Dental Changes Led to Introduction of ‘F’ and ‘V’ Sounds (www.sci.news)

submitted 9 months ago by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/linguistics@mander.xyz

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Link for the Science research article. The observation that societies without access to softer food kind of avoided labiodentals is old, from 1985, but the research is recent-ish (2019).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] digehode@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My favourite bit of this is the comment at the bottom of the page that just says "doubt it". So glad scientific discourse is alive and well.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 7 points 9 months ago

I'm glad, too. This sort of scepticism is one of the pillars of science. Like, just because it seems solid (it does, for me) it doesn't mean that it's true.

A factor not mentioned by either the research nor the article is that [f v] sound considerably sharper than [ɸ β], so there are contrastive reasons to shift the fricatives from bilabial to labiodental if the effort necessary doesn't make them too convoluted to pronounce.