Anarchism

3705 readers

1 users here now

Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!

Rules:

Be respectful
Don't be a nazi
Argue about the point and not the person
This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.

See also:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq@slrpnk.net

sexy_peach@feddit.de

Reading suggestions for deeper theory and praxis (lemm.ee)

submitted 9 months ago by BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee to c/anarchism@lemmy.ml

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey all, I started my dive into anarchism a little over a year ago and I've read a lot of the anarchy/socialism 101 type books but I'm starting to find a lot of it repetitive. I'm looking for suggestions to deepen my understanding of anarchism and libertarian socialism. Especially praxis and tactics, a lot of theory that I've come across doesn't really get into the weeds about applying it, and as someone in an area with no leftist orgs to speak of (outside of a small DSA chapter), I don't have anyone local to go to in order to learn from.

I want to start putting all of this knowledge to use in my area but I'm not 100% sure where to start or how to avoid some of the pitfalls of organizing. Any suggestions would be much appreciated!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Its a great read for sure! While it wasn't huge on theory per se, it had a hopeful streak that I found very encouraging. It was one of the first strictly anarchist books I read and it showed a great contrast to the likes of Marx and Lenin, which I had been reading before. They seemed solely focused on criticizing without posing much in the way of meaningful alternatives to the status quo. I'm sure those suggestions exist on the auth left but a lot of their introductory texts are just "shits bad, yo".

Just reading kropotkin go on for a few pages about dishwashers definitely put me in the mindset of "things can be better, they had the means then so we must have the means now" over the persistent sense of dread that saturated other socialist books.

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hahaha. Sorry, I didn't realize I was replying to OP - I took that comment as being someone's suggestions to you. In that case I'm afraid I don't have much to offer. As I had said in my earlier comment my grasp on anarchist literature these days is a bit spotty (though I'm hoping to start freshening up on it, so I look forward to other replies.)

From what I recall, however, most anarchist writers seem to have an unfortunate tendency to lean more on theory than practice. Furthermore, a lot of the foundational stuff was written in the 19th century, so their practical suggestions are quite often not super applicable to the modern context.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

All good! I have read some more modern texts from FARJ (an especifist org in Brazil), some stuff on zapatismo, and I have more modern texts on the back log. Stuff from Lorenzo Kom'boa Ervin and a handful of queer anarchist theorists as well. There's a boatload of modern theory floating around out there, it's just time consuming to parse through. I also wanted to get "the classics" out of the way to have a good foundation and historical context to pull from when reading more modern work

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

Very cool! I'll have to find some time to read up on some more modern stuff. I vaguely remember one really good modern book from when I went back to finish a poli sci degree 5ish years ago, but unfortunately don't remember the name or author. If I manage to dig it up I'll let you know, as I recall it being quite informative.