this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
1469 points (95.3% liked)

Dank Memes

6146 readers
5 users here now

This is the place to be on the interweb when Reddit irreversibly becomes a meme itself and implodes

If you are existing mods from r/dankmemes, you should be mod here too, kindly DM me on either platform

The many rules inherited from

  1. Be nice, don't be not nice
  2. No Bigotry or Bullying
  3. Don't be a dick!
  4. Censor any and all personal information from posts and comments
  5. No spam, outside links, or videos.
  6. No Metabaiting
  7. No brigading
  8. Keep it dank!
  9. Mark NSFW and spoilers appropriately
  10. NO REEEEEEE-POSTS!
  11. No shitposting
  12. Format your meme correctly. No posts where the title is the meme caption!
  13. No agenda posting!
  14. Don't be a critic
  15. Karma threshold? What's that?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

All you have is a line in the ledger stating that you own it (and who sold it to you). Whether you can enforce copyright through the courts, is very separate issue, and not NFT function.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's as valid as me saying because I am linking the url below, I must own it: https://google.com NFT has no implication that the url being linked is owned in any way.

It's just a url just like I posted in this comment. If I own it or not is irrelevant. There's no proof of actual copyright ownership anywhere involved with NFTs and requires a legal document for copyright, which they don't have.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago

NFT is a record of agreement, that one side acquired something from another. It is as powerful as agreement wrote on paper. So, it might be enforced by court, depending on situation.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

I would pay to sit in on a court hearing where a lawyer is trying to explain blockchains, NFTs, and "smart contracts" to a 70 year old judge.