this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
93 points (93.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54627 readers
533 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“If Western brands do not want to fight piracy in a particular country, it means that they are actually legalizing piracy of their content”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Newtra@pawb.social 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Western companies no longer operating in the Russian market, but still producing desirable content. ... Western companies have 'legalized' piracy in Russia.

100% this.

Media is culture, and IMO people have a right to participate in culture. If it's excessively difficult or impossible to legitimately access culture, one has the moral right to illegitimately access culture, and share it so others also have access.

It's inexcusable to refuse to directly sell media. The internet has made it easier than ever to trade access to media for money. Geo-restricted subscription services should be a nice add-on option for power-consumers, not the only way to get access to something.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's also punishing the citizens of Russia for the crimes of its government.

Denying their participation in culture is a plan doomed to fail, much like prohibition.

[–] teichflamme@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's the point as the people are enabling the government

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

If Donald Trump wins the Presidency illegitimately, will you say the same of US citizens?

So, in a country where the elections are clearly a sham, and have been for decades, it's the people's fault, is that what you're saying?

I couldn't roll my eyes at this bullshit any harder.

[–] teichflamme@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Firstly, Putin has decent support in spite of the elections being a sham.

Secondly, there's literally nothing else you can do to make a regime change happen from the outside. Except war, which no one wants.

So keep rolling your eyes in ignorance.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

That is very easy to say when you are not a dissident living in one of these countries.

Literally why I used the US as an example.

EDIT: Also, you're literally reducing their access to non-Propaganda media sources.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Did you just call western media for non-propaganda? Dude, it's working then.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 2 points 10 months ago

Don't dissidents want regime change to happen more than they want Netflix?

[–] strongarm@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

So what would you suggest then?