this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
231 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59235 readers
3327 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

European Union set to revise cookie law, admits cookie banners are annoying::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The banners should stay. If a site doesn't use cookies, you don't get a banner. The sites choose for themselves if they want to use cookies and put up an obnoxious banner, or not use cookies.

[–] them@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

I think enforcing some universal API for this would be a decent compromise. This would allow browsers to handle the UI which means the user can set a global preference or set it per site. At the very least the UI would be uniform so you wouldn't have to fight dark patterns trying to disable them.

[–] kebabslob@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What are you on about? The banners and cookie abuse should go

[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think what OP is saying that, yes, the cookie abuse should go for sure (I'm actually privvy of the "Legitimate interest" options.)

But that if websites want to track you, then they have to be transparent about it - hence the banners. Wanna track me? Ask me for permission. Is it annoying? Tough luck! Are you losing users because of it? Well, boo-hoo! Remove the tracking and there you go. No banner. Everyone happy.

[–] kebabslob@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But the reality is, that is the reality right now. And unless something is done, its not going away

[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Correct. That's what OP is saying. If websites want to use tracking cookies, they'll have to deal with the consequence of being annoying to their visitors. I'm completely okay with that. Though I'd welcome an alternative.

If websites were nicer about it, I would consider being tracked. So, a small banner consistently saying "Hey can we track you?" in which the default answer is "no" when you hit escape (as opposed to "WE ARE USING COOKIES TO TRACK YOU!!! CLICK SETTINGS TO DISABLE THIS!"), then I might click "yes" every now and then.

[–] kebabslob@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago

To quote republicans, if "ifs" and "buts" were candy and nuts, every day would be Xmas. There's no way that'll ever hold. Just like there's no way video game companies will be less greedy, or box other corporation