this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
800 points (98.1% liked)

Confidently Incorrect

3986 readers
1 users here now

When people are way too smug about their wrong answer.

Posting guidelines.

All posts in this community have come from elsewhere, it is not original content, the poster in this community is not OP. The person who posts in this community isn’t necessarily endorsing whatever the post is talking about and they are not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

There is currently no rule about how recent a post needs to be because the community is about the comeback part, not the topic.

Rules:

• Be civil and remember the human.

• No trolling, insults or name calling. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone.

• No bigotry of any kind, including homophobia, transphobia, sexism and racism.

• You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

• Try not to get too political. A lot of these posts will involve politics, but this isn’t the place for political arguments.

• Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguements sake.

• Mark NSFW posts if they contain nudity.

• Satire is allowed but please start the post title with [satire] so other users can filter it out if they’d like.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  4. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum.
  5. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  6. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  7. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  8. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Facts don’t change people’s minds because most people wield them rhetorically as thinly veiled appeals to authority.

At the end of the day, facts are meaningless themselves. Facts are the residue science leaves behind but the living process of science is one of skepticism.

We let oil companies steal the word “skepticism” and change it from meaning the process of learning something extremely well but still retaining doubt along with a curious impulse to question deeply held beliefs about said thing… to meaning someone has just decided impulsively not to believe something in favor of some random conspiracy theory they found on the ground next to them.

Often I think the best defense of science isn’t to lay down a barrage of facts but to jump into the exciting and curious aspects of the particular science and overpower the conspiracies with the truth that has far more weird details anyways. Convey how weird, strange and mysterious the real scientific truth is, imbue it with the energy of the unknown while still being careful to keep sticking to the real science.

It is that emotional experience that people desire that leads them to believing in conspiracies and I think in some strange way it isn’t that different from the emotional experience of being a scientist driven by the weird mysteries they keep uncovering.

A lot of people turn to conspiracies and dumb ideas because they want to feel like there is something more to the world around them than meets the eye (even if it is sinister). Meeting that energy with facts doesn’t work because it is like trying to smush desire away with banality.

[–] swunchy@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I’m definitely not just a dog on the internet pretending to be human and know human things like taxes and science and where kibbles come from, get off my tail and bark up a different tree bud.

laps up some coffee with tongue

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Nah mate they're plain facts and anyone who disagrees is an idiot who hasn't even read Winston*

*Tried to type Einstein but GBoard decided Winston was better. OK Google.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Facts are the residue science leaves behind

I like this! Actually I like your whole comment. I think a lot of time people wield knowledge, even (approximately) true and helpful knowledge, with selfishness or pointlessness.