this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
83 points (91.1% liked)

Programming

21290 readers
46 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'll just stick them together.

Signed, a Scala programmer.

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, OO and FP aren't really opposed. FP is opposed to imperative programming.

That said, most FP languages give you a slightly different set of tools to use. Algebraic data types and typeclasses are really, really nice.

Honestly, working in Haskell or rust, you don't really miss the fact that you have to jump through hoops to get traditional OO objects. There's just not really many cases where you need them.

[–] AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, me too.

Signed, an F# programmer.

[–] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Slightly jealous of the F#. Similar set of compelling features minus the JVM.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm really glad c# is absorbing more and more functional stuff.

[–] AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is nice for when C# is mandated, but it’ll never replace F#

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I feel in reality that statement is backwards hehe