this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
1771 points (97.6% liked)

Political Memes

5252 readers
1921 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It’s not pointless, because there are plenty who make an excessive salary. However, yeah, it’s not really sufficient because the well-off are already paying less taxes by using different types of income.

We also need to fix how low tax rates are on those other types of incone

If you look back on the tax reductions of the last several Republican administrations, you’ll see they predominantly reduce taxes in these non-salary situations that really only affect the more wealthy

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's pointless in that it's not going to earn enough tax revenue to make a difference. Billionaires didn't become billionaires from their paychecks.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I suppose it depends on what segment of “wealthy” you want to focus on. Billionaires make the news but there are very few of them

Massachusetts recently passed a “millionaires tax” on those earning $1M in the state. It affects 0.6% of the state’s population and has brought in enough to fund school lunches for everyone