this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
220 points (98.2% liked)

Games

16806 readers
1067 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Can someone ELI5 how valve could possibly be sued by Nintendo? As far as I know, valve had nothing to do with the project.

[–] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

In short: they can't. I mean, Nintendo could try, but it would definitely be thrown out. Valve was never directly involved in this project in any way, at least not until stepping in to shut it down. They were just concerned about their IP being in any way connected to anything unauthorized Nintendo.

[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Even if it would get thrown out, they would still have to allocate resources to fight back, which is time and money they would rather spend on something else. I understand why they just don't want to have to deal with a potential lawsuit that may or may not come.

[–] VerseAndVermin@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It's built using something Nintendo made. It all makes sense after watching the creators video. He outlines how the lawyers probed with questions to see if they could do it and that was the nope moment. Plus they don't have incentive to try to fight Nintendo over something that Nintendo may legitimately have reason to fuss over.

[–] Shy_high_guy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My guess is something along the lines of violating the end user agreement of Nintendos Intellectual property the code that the N64 uses. Same reason you can't really get old ROMs of Nintendo games.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Same reason you can't really get old ROMs of Nintendo games.

You're not trying hard enough