this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
389 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59342 readers
4848 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Beijing Superconductor (LK-99) Levitation Video Author Admits Fraud, Takes it Down::The author of one of the Billibilli videos posted as proof of LK-99's levitation capabilities has admitted that his posting was a hoax.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] idkwhatimdoing@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Question for clarity, does it's levation have anything to do with whether or not it's a superconductor?

[–] pragmaOnce@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What I've gathered from many of the discussions around this topic is that the levitation is a notable feature of superconductors due to th Meissner(?) Effect. So if it couldnt levitate, there would be no reason to suspect that it is a superconductor. Because it does levitate, superconductivity is one of a few possibilities.

There have been indicators it may be a semiconductor instead, but apparently the conditions to accurately produce the material are vague/not fully understood - so attempts at reproduction have failed to rule it in or out 100%

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which is also sadly a common component of hoaxes, include some vague component so you can just claim your detractors are doing it wrong.

Very interesting, had no idea of the meissner effect. Thanks!

load more comments (4 replies)