this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Indiana

390 readers
7 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not sure how to feel about this one, but I also wouldn't want to suffer.

Not sure why the restriction from lemmy.

https://fox59.com/news/roughly-130-bills-introduced-ahead-of-indianas-2024-legislative-session/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MSgtRedFox@infosec.pub 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So if I understand correctly, it prescribes that our (Indiana) schools can teach my kid about George Washington, but not that he owned slaves?

If that's correct, for what reason? Is the mention of this becoming the whole point and we're saying everything is about race/slaves/oppression, or are we hiding things as to not reveal people's ugly defects?

Does this lose sight of judging people on today's standards versus the standards of their time? (Not advocating for owning people)

[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, it's the opposite: you can't teach about George Washington unless you are teaching about and only about his support of slavery.

[–] MSgtRedFox@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago

If that's true, I am strongly opposed.

I believe we can and should teach the whole truth, in the proper context, and appreciate what we did right and what we didn't (historical figures, policies, society, etc).