this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
288 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
3097 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Olap@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Q: Why do people add "en" in front? Isn't "shittification" just fine?

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 46 points 10 months ago

the original author coined it

en - shit - ify: [commence] + [ordure] + [make]

I guess because it's the start of a long and slow process, that holds the context of it not being as shit before. Whereas without the prefix it suggests a more sudden, decisive and completed act.

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/en & https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/-ification#English both combine to make a word that means to add to something making it shitter

Shittification would be to make a shit, you could argue that 'en' means that you make something else shitter I think

English is weird https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification