this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
587 points (95.9% liked)

World News

38987 readers
2103 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Chinese women have had it. Their response to Beijing’s demands for more children? No. 

Fed up with government harassment and wary of the sacrifices of child-rearing, many young women are putting themselves ahead of what Beijing and their families want. Their refusal has set off a crisis for the Communist Party, which desperately needs more babies to rejuvenate China’s aging population.

With the number of babies in free fall—fewer than 10 million were born in 2022, compared with around 16 million in 2012—China is headed toward a demographic collapse. China’s population, now around 1.4 billion, is likely to drop to just around half a billion by 2100, according to some projections. Women are taking the blame.

In October, Chinese Leader Xi Jinping urged the state-backed All-China Women’s Federation to “prevent and resolve risks in the women’s field,” according to an official account of the speech.

“It’s clear that he was not talking about risks faced by women but considering women as a major threat to social stability,” said Clyde Yicheng Wang, an assistant professor of politics at Washington and Lee University who studies Chinese government propaganda.

The State Council, China’s top government body, didn’t respond to questions about Beijing’s population policies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The allure of DINKs and solo living is too strong even when developed countries started to get really developed earlier on.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

DINK?

Edit: Ah, Dual Income No Kids!

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wait... Wait wait wait...

Mr. and Mrs. Dink, from the 90s cartoon 'Doug'... Was that deliberate or a coincidence!?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Deliberate. They were suppose to come across as materialistic because they chose toys over kids. Also, they were always inviting Doug over, as if they regretted not having kids.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Very expensive

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah, it's really no wonder many are choosing not to have kids these days. It's insanely expensive and inconvenient and governments do very little to make it financially attractive. At least in the US.