this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
315 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59342 readers
5304 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
315
The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement (edition.cnn.com)
submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement::The New York Times has sued OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement, alleging that the companies’ artificial intelligence technology illegally copied millions of Times articles to train ChatGPT and other services to provide people with information – technology that now competes with the Times.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thru_dangers_untold@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

There is evidence to suggest some LLM's have the ability to produce original outputs, such as DeepMind's solution to the cap set problem.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06924-6

On the other hand LLM's have some incredible text compression abilities

https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.07633

I'm pretty sure there is copyright infringement going on by the letter of the law. But I also think the world would be better off if copyright laws were a bit more loose. Not wild-west anything-goes libertarianism, but more open than the current state.

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago

I tend to agree with your last point, especially because of the way the system has been bastardized over the years. What started out as well intentioned legislation to ensure that authors and artists maintain control over their work has become a contentious and litigious minefield that barely protects creators.